# Analysis of Hybrid Bond Origination Candidates ## Key Considerations for Hybrid Bond Issuance: Hybrid bonds are typically attractive for companies that: 1. Have stable, reliable cash flows 2. Possess substantial asset bases (collateral) 3. Show strong credit metrics and profitability 4. Have moderate to high leverage ratios where hybrid capital improves the balance sheet 5. Demonstrate consistent operational performance 6. Have investment-grade credit standing ## Detailed Analysis: ### Entity A: TERNA S.p.A. (Italian Utility - Electricity Grid) **Strengths:** - Exceptional operating income: €1,333.5M (2022: €1,200.4M) - growing - Strong margins: 45% EBIT margin on revenues - Stable regulated utility business - Consistent dividend payments: €10.61 per share (2022-23) - Already issued hybrid bonds: €989M perpetual hybrid bonds in FY2023 - **Already experienced in hybrid markets** - this is critical **Financial Position:** - Net debt-to-EBITDA: ~1.5x (healthy) - Equity ratio improving: 27% (2023) vs 21% (2022) - Strong recurring cash flows: €2.3B from operations **Assessment:** TERNA has ALREADY successfully accessed hybrid markets and has done so recently. This signals established relationships and proven demand. However, they may not have urgent refinancing needs. ### Entity B: A2A ENERGIA S.p.A. (Italian Energy Company) **Challenges:** - Profit declined significantly: €401M (2023) vs €504M (2022) - declining trend - Operating leverage issues despite €23.2B revenue - Leverage appears moderate but company-specific concerns exist - Complex capital structure with multiple entities - Free cash flow: €118M (2022) vs -€460M (2021) - volatile **Financial Position:** - Equity ratio: 21% (relatively low for utility) - Debt increased substantially: €6.9B (current liabilities include borrowings) - Working capital intensive business model **Assessment:** A2A shows declining profitability and volatile cash flows, making it LESS attractive for hybrid issuance. ### Entity C: REDEIA CORPORACION SA (Spanish Transmission Grid Operator) **Strengths:** - Stable operating income: €961.5M (2022: €992.0M) - slightly declining but consistent - Strong revenue base: €2.015B consistently growing - Stable utility business model (monopoly-like position) - Moderate profitability: €664.7M profit (2023) vs €680.6M (2022) **Financial Position:** - **Higher leverage concern**: Noncurrent financial liabilities €5.5B on assets of €14.8B - Equity ratio: 33% (2023), up from 26% (2022) - improving trend - Net debt still substantial after recent activity - Recent financing activity: €203M issuance of debt instruments (2022-23) **Assessment:** REDEIA has improving equity ratios and appears to be in active capital markets. The company operates in regulated infrastructure with stable cash flows, but leverage levels are higher. ## Prioritization Reasoning: **First Priority: TERNA (Entity A)** - Already proven access to hybrid markets with recent €989M issuance - Strongest credit profile and margins - Regulated utility with predictable cash flows - May seek to refinance/optimally manage hybrid capital structure - Bank has template and precedent to work from **Second Priority: REDEIA (Entity C)** - Stable Spanish regulated utility - Currently active in capital markets - Improving leverage metrics suggest appetite for hybrid solutions - Similar to TERNA in business model but with higher leverage - Good refinancing candidate if TERNA not available **Third Priority: A2A (Entity B)** - Declining profitability concerns - Volatile cash flows - Higher-risk profile for new hybrid issuance - May face resistance from rating agencies - Less ideal credit story for hybrid bond investors A,C,B