I need to calculate Net Debt / EBITDA for both years to determine the leverage trend. ## Step 1: Calculate EBITDA **EBITDA = Operating Profit (before D&A and equity method) + D&A** But let me use a cleaner approach. From the income statement: **For 2022 (period 2022-01-01 to 2023-01-01):** - Revenue: 8,299M - Operating Expense: 9,395M - Share of profit from equity method: 120M - Operating Profit (Profit Loss From Operating Activities): -976M EBITDA = Operating Profit + D&A = -976M + 1,233M = 257M But S&P typically adjusts EBITDA. Let me also consider that S&P would add back the share of equity method profits and potentially treat lease payments differently. However, let me keep it simpler first. Actually, S&P's adjusted EBITDA typically starts from operating income and adds back D&A. The operating profit here already includes the equity method income. EBITDA (2022) = -976 + 1,233 = 257M EUR **For 2021 (period 2021-01-01 to 2022-01-01):** - Operating Profit: -275M - D&A: 1,165M EBITDA (2021) = -275 + 1,165 = 890M EUR ## Step 2: Calculate Net Debt **Net Debt = Total Borrowings + Lease Liabilities - Cash** **At 2023-01-01 (end of 2022):** - Long-term Borrowings: 19,006M - Short-term Borrowings: 709M - Current Bank Overdrafts: 0M - Noncurrent Lease Liabilities: 574M - Current Lease Liabilities: 155M - Cash: 6,547M Net Debt (end 2022) = 19,006 + 709 + 0 + 574 + 155 - 6,547 = 13,897M **At 2022-01-01 (end of 2021):** - Long-term Borrowings: 12,366M - Short-term Borrowings: 1,339M - Current Bank Overdrafts: 64M - Noncurrent Lease Liabilities: 235M - Current Lease Liabilities: 169M - Cash: 3,204M Net Debt (end 2021) = 12,366 + 1,339 + 64 + 235 + 169 - 3,204 = 10,969M ## Step 3: Calculate Net Debt / EBITDA **For 2022 (using end-2022 net debt and 2022 EBITDA):** Net Debt / EBITDA = 13,897 / 257 = 54.1x **For 2021 (using end-2021 net debt and 2021 EBITDA):** Net Debt / EBITDA = 10,969 / 890 = 12.3x The ratio went from ~12.3x to ~54.1x, a massive increase of ~41.8x, which is far greater than 0.3x. This is clearly **Deteriorating** — Net Debt increased substantially while EBITDA collapsed. Even if I adjust the EBITDA calculation differently (e.g., excluding equity method income), the trend would still be sharply deteriorating as both debt increased and profitability declined significantly. Deteriorating