To evaluate the extent to which VINCI should be advised to issue hybrid bonds, we need to analyze the company's financial risk profile, business position, and the cost-benefit dynamics of hybrid instruments for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022.

**1. Leverage and Credit Metrics:**
VINCI exhibits an extraordinarily strong balance sheet and robust cash flow generation. For 2022, the company generated roughly €10.2 billion in FFO (Funds From Operations) against reported total gross borrowings of approximately €30 billion (consisting of non-current bonds, other non-current borrowings, and short-term debt). However, netting its massive €12.5 billion in cash and cash equivalents, net debt drops to roughly €17.5 billion. This translates to an incredibly strong FFO-to-Net Debt ratio exceeding 50% and a Net Debt-to-EBITDA below 1.5x. There is no meaningful leverage pressure or deterioration in credit metrics that would necessitate capital structure optimization through hybrid equity-content.

**2. Refinancing and Capex Needs:**
Operating cash flows reached €9.38 billion, which comfortably covered net investing cash outflows of €5.31 billion (even following the integration of Cobra IS and robust concession capex). The remaining free cash flow easily covers dividend distributions (€1.89 billion) and share buybacks (€1.1 billion). With positive free cash flow and a massive liquidity cushion of €12.5 billion, the company's refinancing and funding needs are low and adequately covered internally and via standard senior debt markets. 

**3. Cost of Capital:**
VINCI enjoys an "A" category credit rating and highly competitive financing costs. Its average gross interest cost is remarkably low (net finance costs of €614 million on roughly €30 billion of gross debt implies an average cost of debt around 2%). Considering the market data for 2022, standard corporate bond yields spiked, but the Sub-Senior Delta for non-financial IG issuers also widened materially to ~2.3%. Issuing hybrid bonds would command yields significantly above VINCI's current cost of debt, materially dragging down its low cost of capital without providing any needed rating flexibility. 

**4. Capital Structure:**
VINCI does not currently rely on hybrid bonds to support its "A" range ratings. Because the company requires no extraordinary rating defense, lacks transformational unfunded M&A for the coming 18 months, and has a very healthy leverage metric, the issuance of expensive subordinated hybrid debt offers no marginal benefit. 

Given these factors—low refinancing needs, limited to no requirement for leverage optimization, strong rating profile ("A" range), and the fact that issuing hybrids would materially increase the current cost of debt unnecessarily—VINCI should not pursue hybrid bond issuance.

<answer>0%</answer>