# Analysis of Hybrid Bond Suitability ## Entity A: TenneT Holding B.V. **Business Profile:** - Transmission system operator (TSO) — regulated utility, strongly suitable category - Owned by the Dutch State - Located in the Netherlands/Germany **Financial Analysis:** - **Existing hybrid capital:** €2,125M outstanding (already a hybrid issuer) - **Profitability:** Operating losses of -€976M (2022) and -€275M (2021) — significant deterioration - **Net loss:** -€879M (2022) vs -€340M (2021) — worsening - **Leverage:** Total debt (LT borrowings €19B + ST borrowings €709M) = ~€19.7B against equity of €7.7B. Debt/Equity ratio ~2.6x - **Massive capex program:** €4.4B in 2022, up from €3.7B in 2021 — energy transition investments - **Significant new borrowings:** €7.3B raised in 2022, long-term borrowings grew from €12.4B to €19B - **Capital injection:** €1.23B equity contribution from Dutch State in 2022 - **FFO metrics:** Operating cash flows of only €1.2B vs capex of €4.4B — huge funding gap - **Credit metrics are deteriorating rapidly** with massive leverage increase and operating losses - Already has €2.125B hybrid outstanding — refinancing need is relevant - The massive capex program and deteriorating metrics create strong rationale for additional hybrid issuance to support credit metrics **Assessment: STRONGLY SUITABLE — Top priority.** Deteriorating credit metrics, regulated utility, massive capex needs, existing hybrid program, and need to preserve rating make this the most urgent candidate. ## Entity B: REDEIA CORPORACION SA (Red Eléctrica) **Business Profile:** - Spanish electricity transmission system operator — regulated utility - Strongly suitable category **Financial Analysis:** - **No existing hybrid capital** — no refinancing need - **Profitability:** Stable and profitable — €681M net income (2022), €686M (2021) - **Operating income:** €962M (2022) vs €992M (2021) — slight decline but healthy - **Leverage:** LT borrowings €5.5B + current borrowings €722M = ~€6.2B against equity of €4.9B. Moderate leverage - **Debt reduction:** LT borrowings decreased from €5.9B to €5.5B; current borrowings decreased from €1.4B to €0.7B - **Strong cash generation:** Operating cash flows of €1.57B - **Dividends:** ~€544M — well covered by operating cash flows - **Equity increased significantly** from €3.7B to €4.9B (including €1B capital raise via treasury share sales) - **Credit metrics appear stable** — no urgent deterioration - Capex of ~€536M is manageable relative to operating cash flows **Assessment: MARGINALLY SUITABLE.** Regulated utility profile fits, but stable/improving metrics and no existing hybrids mean less urgency. A hybrid could opportunistically improve leverage metrics or support future growth investments. ## Entity C: ENGIE **Business Profile:** - Major integrated energy utility — diversified operations including generation, networks, renewables - Strongly suitable category (utility/energy infrastructure) **Financial Analysis:** - **Existing hybrid capital ("Deeply Subordinated Perpetual Notes"):** €3,393M (down from €3,767M) — active hybrid program with net redemptions of €374M in 2022 - **Profitability:** Net income only €390M (2022) vs €3,758M (2021) — massive decline - **Operating income:** €1.1B (2022) vs €6.7B (2021) — severe deterioration driven by impairments and mark-to-market losses - **Massive balance sheet:** Total assets €235B, significant derivative exposure - **Leverage:** LT borrowings €28B + current borrowings €12.5B = ~€40.5B against equity of €39.3B - **Strong operating cash flows:** €8.6B — robust - **Large capex:** €6.4B - **Hybrid operations in 2022:** Net reduction of €374M in perpetual notes + €77M costs = €451M decrease. This suggests potential refinancing need - **Dividends:** €2.6B paid — significant - **Significant discontinued operations:** €2.2B income from disposals (Equans likely) - Equity declined from €42B to €39.3B **Assessment: STRONGLY SUITABLE.** Large utility with existing hybrid program, some deterioration in earnings, ongoing hybrid redemptions suggesting refinancing needs. However, strong operating cash flows and large scale provide some buffer. ## Ranking Decision 1. **Entity A (TenneT)** — Highest priority: Most urgent case with rapidly deteriorating credit metrics, massive capex-driven funding needs, existing hybrid program, regulated TSO profile, and clear need for hybrid to support credit rating. The operating losses and tripling of debt create pressing need. 2. **Entity C (ENGIE)** — Second priority: Existing hybrid program with recent redemptions (€374M reduction), earnings deterioration, large scale utility with ongoing capital needs. The hybrid refinancing angle and credit metric support are relevant but less urgent than TenneT. 3. **Entity B (REDEIA)** — Third priority: While a regulated TSO (ideal profile), the stable/improving financials, no existing hybrid program, and manageable leverage make this more opportunistic than urgent. A,C,B