# Hybrid Bonds Assessment for Terna S.p.A. ## Company Profile & Industry Context Terna S.p.A. is Italy's national transmission system operator for electricity ("Terna" means "electrical network" in Italian). This is a **regulated utility** operating in the electricity transmission sector under a strong regulatory framework. The company operates as a natural monopoly with regulatory oversight ensuring cost and investment recovery. ## Key Financial Metrics Analysis (FY 2022) ### Capital Structure - **Total Equity**: €6,169.1m (2023) vs €4,713.0m (2022) - **Long-term Borrowings**: €8,416.7m (2023) vs €8,835.0m (2022) - **Short-term Borrowings + Current portion of LT Debt**: €2,353.4m (2023) - **Existing Hybrid Bonds**: €989.0m (issued during 2022) - **Total Debt**: €10,770.1m (2023) - **Total Adjusted Capital** (Equity + Debt): €16,939.1m ### Current Hybrid Positioning - Hybrids represent **5.8%** of total adjusted capital (€989m / €16,939m) - The company has recently issued €989m in perpetual hybrid bonds in 2022 - This suggests management's acknowledgment of capital structure optimization needs ### Leverage & Profitability Metrics (2022) - **EBITDA**: €1,333.5m (Operating Profit) + €725.7m (D&A) = €2,059.2m - **Net Debt**: €10,770.1m - €2,155.1m (cash) = €8,614.9m - **Net Debt/EBITDA**: 4.2x - **EBITDA Margin**: 71.0% (€2,059.2m / €2,898m Revenue) - **ROE**: 13.9% (€857m / avg €6,141m equity) - **Interest Coverage (EBIT/Interest Expense)**: 10.9x ### Capital Expenditure & Refinancing Needs - **2022 Capex**: €1,492.3m (Property, Plant & Equipment) - **2022 Free Operating Cash Flow**: €2,323.7m - **Operating Cash Flow represents 80% of revenues** - excellent cash generation - **Debt repayments**: €289m in 2022; long-term debt decreased by €418.3m ## Regulatory Advantage Assessment Per S&P methodology for regulated utilities, Terna exhibits: **Strong Preliminary Regulatory Advantage:** - Italian regulatory framework provides **transparent, predictable cost recovery** for transmission operators - **Full recovery of operating costs, capital investments, and reasonable return** enshrined in law - **Regulatory stability**: The Italian transmission regulatory regime is stable and consistent - **Tariff-setting mechanisms**: Regulated tariffs allow timely recovery of operating and capital costs - **No commodity risk**: Pure transmission business with pass-through mechanisms - **Regulatory independence**: Independent regulator (TERNA operates under ARERA oversight in Italy) **Business Strategy Assessment**: Positive - Terna has demonstrated effective regulatory management and cost control, maintaining stable relationships with the regulator. **Final Regulatory Advantage**: **STRONG** ## Scale, Scope & Diversity Assessment - **National monopoly** position in Italian electricity transmission - **Large asset base**: €16.2bn in PP&E (primarily transmission infrastructure) - **Essential service** to the Italian economy - **Stable, regulated revenue** with limited economic cyclicality - **Geographic diversity** implicit in national transmission network **Assessment**: STRONG ## Operating Efficiency Assessment - **Cost structure**: Well-controlled; expenses of €1,631m (56% of revenue) reflect operational efficiency - **Asset quality**: Modern transmission assets with ongoing capex for grid modernization - **Safety/Reliability**: Transmission operator subject to strict regulatory standards - **Management of capex**: Consistent capex discipline; projects managed within regulatory frameworks **Assessment**: STRONG/ADEQUATE ## Financial Risk Profile Analysis ### Leverage Position - Net Debt/EBITDA of **4.2x** is moderate for a regulated utility - FFO/Debt coverage: Operating cash flow of €2,323.7m provides strong debt service capability - Debt maturity profile is well-staggered with long-term debt of €8.4bn ### Refinancing Needs (Next 18 months) - **Short-term refinancing**: €2,353.4m due (short-term borrowings + current portion of LT debt) - **Estimated annual capex**: €1,500m+ (based on 2022 levels) - **Annual interest costs**: €121.8m (2022) - **FCF generation**: €2,323.7m (2022) after capex and interest - **Total 18-month funding needs**: Approximately €3.8-4.0bn (refinancing + capex) ### Cost of Debt Analysis - **Current interest expense**: €121.8m / €10,770m = 1.13% all-in cost - **Market conditions (2022)**: Swap rates at **1.93% (10Y)**, Corporate IG spreads at **2.30%** - **Sub-senior delta**: 0.2% (hybrid would trade ~20bps higher than senior debt) - **Estimated hybrid cost**: 4.1-4.5% (significantly above current 1.13% blended cost) - **Cost of hybrid will INCREASE overall cost of debt**, but provided solid refinancing diversification ### Rating Implications Terna's credit profile is strong: - High EBITDA margins (71%) - Essential service provider - Strong regulatory framework - Solid leverage metrics for the sector - Likely **"A" range rating** or equivalent (investment grade, upper tier) **Current assessment**: The company is NOT under downgrade pressure and has good rating headroom. ## Hybrid Bonds Assessment Against Guidance ### Key Observations 1. **Existing Hybrid Position**: €989m already outstanding (5.8% of adjusted capital) demonstrates recent capital optimization 2. **Refinancing Needs**: Moderate at €2.4bn over 18 months; manageable through traditional debt markets given strong cash generation 3. **Leverage Position**: At 4.2x Net Debt/EBITDA, there is modest leverage optimization opportunity, but not urgent 4. **Rating Profile**: Strong "A" range rating profile with headroom; no extraordinary downgrade pressure 5. **Cost Consideration**: Hybrid cost would be significantly higher (~4.2%) than current blended cost (~1.1%), implying materially increased cost of debt 6. **Capex Intensity**: While transmission grid requires ongoing capex (~€1.5bn annually), this is well-covered by FCF generation 7. **Regulatory Support**: Strong regulatory framework ensures cost recovery, reducing urgency of aggressive capital structure optimization ### Alignment with Guidance Categories The company's profile is closest to **3.75% to 7.5% of adjusted capital**: - ✓ Moderate refinancing needs (€2.4bn over 18 months) - ✓ Mild to moderate leverage optimization rationale (4.2x leverage provides some room) - ✓ Hybrid issuance provides useful rating flexibility and diversifies funding sources - ✓ Cost of hybrid will **increase** current cost of debt (not favorable factor) - ✓ Strong regulatory profile provides confidence in stable cash flow generation - ✓ Not at risk of downgrade without hybrid support ### Maximum Capacity Analysis - S&P cap: 15% of €16,939m = €2,540.5m - Current hybrids: €989m - Potential additional issuance: €1,551.5m - Annual issuance limit: €3bn (can accommodate) ## Conclusion **Terna presents a moderate case for hybrid bonds**, but several factors argue against aggressive utilization: **Factors Supporting Limited Hybrid Issuance:** - Moderate refinancing needs (not critical) - Strong FCF generation (€2.3bn annually) - Strong regulatory framework providing cash flow certainty - Solid leverage metrics (4.2x is reasonable for regulated utilities) - Good rating profile with headroom **Factors Against Substantial Hybrid Issuance:** - Materially increased cost of debt (~300+ bps) outweighs benefits - No rating downgrade pressure requiring capital optimization - Strong cash generation reduces urgency - Already issued €989m hybrids in 2022 (recency factor) - Essential monopoly utility has strong traditional debt market access **Recommendation**: A **modest additional issuance** of hybrids would provide useful funding diversification and modest leverage optimization without the cost penalties of larger programs. This aligns with a **7.5% target** (approximately €500-700m additional issuance), representing reasonable diversification while respecting the cost disadvantage versus traditional debt. This level: - Provides meaningful but not excessive leverage optimization - Offers funding source diversification - Respects the cost-benefit trade-off - Maintains financial flexibility - Is achievable within annual issuance guidelines 7.5%